mirror of https://github.com/01-edu/public.git
You can not select more than 25 topics
Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
98 lines
3.6 KiB
98 lines
3.6 KiB
10 months ago
|
|
||
|
|
#### Comprehension
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
##### Ask the student to describe the microservices architecture implemented.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
###### Have you clearly defined the boundaries for each microservice based on business domains?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
###### Do your microservices align directly with specific business functions?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
###### Are your microservices designed to operate independently of one another?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
###### Can each microservice be deployed, updated, and scaled without affecting others?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
###### Is your architecture designed to support the independent scalability of each microservice?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
###### Does your system maintain functionality even when one or more services fail?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
###### Is there an API Gateway in your architecture to manage incoming requests?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
###### Can you track and trace a request across multiple services easily?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
##### Ask the student to explain one of the Ansible playbook
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
###### Did he/she clearly explain all the Ansible playbook?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
##### Discuss the CI/CD pipeline setup.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
###### Are there unit tests for each functionality and are the tests running for each new PR?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
###### Is the SonarQube report free from any error or warning that can break the CI/CD Process?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
##### Detail the security measures implemented.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
###### Were comprehensive security measures like SSL/TLS, secret management, and the principle of least privilege correctly implemented?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
##### Ask the student to explain the database schema for PostgreSQL and Neo4j.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
###### Did the data structure in PostgreSQL and Neo4j effectively support the application's requirements?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### Functional
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
##### Verify the execution of Ansible playbooks.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
###### Did the Ansible playbooks execute without errors and configure the environment as intended?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
###### Were the playbooks able to handle re-running scenarios without causing disruptions or inconsistencies?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
##### Verify Docker and Ansible setup.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
###### Were Docker containers and Ansible playbooks set up correctly and functionally?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
##### Test each microservice API.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
###### Are all the microservices' APIs only accessible when logged in with an Admin profile?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
##### Admin should be able to perform CRUD operations for users, travelers and payment methods. For each "entity" try to create, read, update and delete.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
###### Is everything working as expected?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
###### Are errors handled correctly?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
##### Test Authentication and Authorization.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
###### Was the authentication service robust and did the role-based access control function correctly?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
##### Ask the student to Simulate load on microservices.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
###### Did the microservices demonstrate effective load balancing and failover under heavy traffic?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
##### Validate CI/CD pipeline and code quality.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
###### Did the CI/CD pipeline function correctly for build, test, and deployment processes, and were code quality standards maintained?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
##### Assess code review and best practices.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
###### Is the code consistent and well-structured?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
###### Are all pull requests following naming conventions such as (Camel Case, Pascal Case, ...), Consistency, clarity and descriptiveness?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
##### Check SonarQube logs in recent pull requests.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
###### Is the log free of warnings about unsupported or deprecated libraries?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
###### Are the security vulnerabilities found by SonarQube resolved in the pull requests?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
#### Bonus
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
##### Documentation Quality
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
###### +Did the students provide clear documentation about the application and the database?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
##### Kubernetes Incorporation
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
###### +Did the students Incorporate Kubernetes alongside Ansible to enhance service management, orchestration, and load-balancing capabilities?
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
##### Additional Bonuses
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
###### +Did the student add any valuable bonuses and it works fine without any error
|