#### Exercise 0: Environment and libraries ##### The exercise is validated if all questions of the exercise are validated. ##### Activate the virtual environment. If you used `conda` run `conda activate your_env`. ##### Run `python --version`. ###### Does it print `Python 3.x`? x >= 8 ###### Do `import jupyter`, `import numpy` and `import pandas` run without any error? --- --- #### Exercise 1: Series ##### The exercise is validated if all questions of the exercise are validated. ###### For question 1, is the output as below? The best solution uses `pd.date_range` to generate the index and `range` to generate the integer series. ```console 2010-01-01 0 2010-01-02 1 2010-01-03 2 2010-01-04 3 2010-01-05 4 ... 2020-12-27 4013 2020-12-28 4014 2020-12-29 4015 2020-12-30 4016 2020-12-31 4017 Freq: D, Name: integer_series, Length: 4018, dtype: int64 ``` ###### Is the output as below? If the `NaN` values have been dropped the solution is also accepted. The solution uses `rolling().mean()`. ```console 2010-01-01 NaN 2010-01-02 NaN 2010-01-03 NaN 2010-01-04 NaN 2010-01-05 NaN ... 2020-12-27 4010.0 2020-12-28 4011.0 2020-12-29 4012.0 2020-12-30 4013.0 2020-12-31 4014.0 Freq: D, Name: integer_series, Length: 4018, dtype: float64 ``` --- --- #### Exercise 2: Financial data ##### The exercise is validated if all questions of the exercise are validated. ###### Have the missing values and data types been checked? ###### Have the string dates been converted to datetime type? ###### Have the dates been set as index? ###### Have `info` or/and `describe` been used to have a first look at the data? ###### For question 1, are the right columns inserted in `Candlestick` `Plotly` object? The Candlestick is based on Open, High, Low and Close columns. The index is Date (datetime). ###### For question 2, is the output of `print(transformed_df.head().to_markdown())` as below and are there **482 months**? | Date | Open | Close | Volume | High | Low | | :------------------ | -------: | -------: | ----------: | -------: | -------: | | 1980-12-31 00:00:00 | 0.136075 | 0.135903 | 1.34485e+09 | 0.161272 | 0.112723 | | 1981-01-30 00:00:00 | 0.141768 | 0.141316 | 6.08989e+08 | 0.155134 | 0.126116 | | 1981-02-27 00:00:00 | 0.118215 | 0.117892 | 3.21619e+08 | 0.128906 | 0.106027 | | 1981-03-31 00:00:00 | 0.111328 | 0.110871 | 7.00717e+08 | 0.120536 | 0.09654 | | 1981-04-30 00:00:00 | 0.121811 | 0.121545 | 5.36928e+08 | 0.131138 | 0.108259 | To get this result there are two ways: `resample` and `groupby`. There are two key steps: - Find how to affect the aggregation on the last **business** day of each month. This is already implemented in Pandas and the keyword that should be used either in `resample` parameter or in `Grouper` is `BM`. - Choose the right aggregation function for each variable. The prices (Open, Close and Adjusted Close) should be aggregated by taking the `mean`. Low should be aggregated by taking the `minimum` because it represents the lower price of the day, so the lowest price on the month is the lowest price of the lowest prices on the day. The same logic applied to High, leads to use the `maximum` to aggregate the High. Volume should be aggregated using the `sum` because the monthly volume is equal to the sum of daily volume over the month. ###### For question 3, does it not involve a for loop and is the output as below? The first way to do it is to compute the return without for loop is to use `pct_change`. And the second way to do it is to implement the formula given in the exercise in a vectorized way. To get the value at `t-1` the data has to be shifted with `shift`. ```console Date 1980-12-12 NaN 1980-12-15 -0.047823 1980-12-16 -0.073063 1980-12-17 0.019703 1980-12-18 0.028992 ... 2021-01-25 0.049824 2021-01-26 0.003704 2021-01-27 -0.001184 2021-01-28 -0.027261 2021-01-29 -0.026448 Name: Open, Length: 10118, dtype: float64 ``` --- --- #### Exercise 3: Multi asset returns ###### Is the outputted DataFrame's shape `(261, 5)` without having used a for loop and the is the output the same as the one returned with this line of code? The DataFrame contains random data. Make sure the output and the one returned by this code is based on the same DataFrame. ```python market_data.loc[market_data.index.get_level_values('Ticker')=='AAPL'].sort_index().pct_change() ``` --- --- #### Exercise 4: Backtest ##### The exercise is validated if all questions of the exercise are validated. ###### Have the missing values and data types been checked? ###### Have the string dates been converted to datetime type? ###### Have the dates been set as index? ###### Have `info` or/and `describe` been used to have a first look at the data? **My results can be reproduced using: `np.random.seed = 2712`. Given the versions of NumPy used I do not guaranty the reproducibility of the results - that is why I also explain the steps to get to the solution.** ###### For question 1, is the return computed as Return(t) = (Price(t+1) - Price(t))/Price(t) and returns the following output? Note that if the index is not ordered in ascending order the future return computed is wrong. ```console Date 1980-12-12 -0.052170 1980-12-15 -0.073403 1980-12-16 0.024750 1980-12-17 0.029000 1980-12-18 0.061024 ... 2021-01-25 0.001679 2021-01-26 -0.007684 2021-01-27 -0.034985 2021-01-28 -0.037421 2021-01-29 NaN Name: Daily_futur_returns, Length: 10118, dtype: float64 ``` An example of solution is: ```python def compute_futur_return(price): return (price.shift(-1) - price)/price compute_futur_return(df['Adj Close']) ``` ###### For question 2, is the index of the Series the same as the index of the DataFrame? The data of the series can be generated using `np.random.randint(0,2,len(df.index)`. ###### For question 3, is the Pnl computed as: signal \* futur_return? Both series should have the same index. The below result are obtained considering the random strategy with the with `np.random.seed = 2712` ```console Date 1980-12-12 -0.052170 1980-12-15 -0.000000 1980-12-16 0.024750 1980-12-17 0.029000 1980-12-18 0.061024 ... 2021-01-25 0.001679 2021-01-26 -0.007684 2021-01-27 -0.000000 2021-01-28 -0.037421 2021-01-29 NaN Name: PnL, Length: 10119, dtype: float64 ``` ###### For question 4, is the return of the strategy computed as: `(Total earned - Total invested) / Total` invested? The result should be close to 0. The formula given could be simplified as `(PnLs.sum())/signal.sum()`. My return is: 0.00043546984088551553 because I invested 5147$ and I earned 5149$. ###### For question 5, is the previous signal Series being replaced with 1s? Similarly as the previous question, we earned 10128$ and we invested 10118$ which leads to a return of 0.00112670194140969 (0.1%).