mirror of https://github.com/01-edu/public.git
You can not select more than 25 topics
Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
73 lines
3.2 KiB
73 lines
3.2 KiB
2 years ago
|
Citation Request:
|
||
|
|
This dataset is public available for research. The details are described in [Cortez et al., 2009].
|
||
|
|
Please include this citation if you plan to use this database:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
P. Cortez, A. Cerdeira, F. Almeida, T. Matos and J. Reis.
|
||
|
|
Modeling wine preferences by data mining from physicochemical properties.
|
||
|
|
In Decision Support Systems, Elsevier, 47(4):547-553. ISSN: 0167-9236.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Available at: [@Elsevier] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2009.05.016
|
||
|
|
[Pre-press (pdf)] http://www3.dsi.uminho.pt/pcortez/winequality09.pdf
|
||
|
|
[bib] http://www3.dsi.uminho.pt/pcortez/dss09.bib
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
1. Title: Wine Quality
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
2. Sources
|
||
|
|
Created by: Paulo Cortez (Univ. Minho), Antonio Cerdeira, Fernando Almeida, Telmo Matos and Jose Reis (CVRVV) @ 2009
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
3. Past Usage:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
P. Cortez, A. Cerdeira, F. Almeida, T. Matos and J. Reis.
|
||
|
|
Modeling wine preferences by data mining from physicochemical properties.
|
||
|
|
In Decision Support Systems, Elsevier, 47(4):547-553. ISSN: 0167-9236.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
In the above reference, two datasets were created, using red and white wine samples.
|
||
|
|
The inputs include objective tests (e.g. PH values) and the output is based on sensory data
|
||
|
|
(median of at least 3 evaluations made by wine experts). Each expert graded the wine quality
|
||
|
|
between 0 (very bad) and 10 (very excellent). Several data mining methods were applied to model
|
||
|
|
these datasets under a regression approach. The support vector machine model achieved the
|
||
|
|
best results. Several metrics were computed: MAD, confusion matrix for a fixed error tolerance (T),
|
||
|
|
etc. Also, we plot the relative importances of the input variables (as measured by a sensitivity
|
||
|
|
analysis procedure).
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
4. Relevant Information:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
The two datasets are related to red and white variants of the Portuguese "Vinho Verde" wine.
|
||
|
|
For more details, consult: http://www.vinhoverde.pt/en/ or the reference [Cortez et al., 2009].
|
||
|
|
Due to privacy and logistic issues, only physicochemical (inputs) and sensory (the output) variables
|
||
|
|
are available (e.g. there is no data about grape types, wine brand, wine selling price, etc.).
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
These datasets can be viewed as classification or regression tasks.
|
||
|
|
The classes are ordered and not balanced (e.g. there are munch more normal wines than
|
||
|
|
excellent or poor ones). Outlier detection algorithms could be used to detect the few excellent
|
||
|
|
or poor wines. Also, we are not sure if all input variables are relevant. So
|
||
|
|
it could be interesting to test feature selection methods.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
5. Number of Instances: red wine - 1599; white wine - 4898.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
6. Number of Attributes: 11 + output attribute
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Note: several of the attributes may be correlated, thus it makes sense to apply some sort of
|
||
|
|
feature selection.
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
7. Attribute information:
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
For more information, read [Cortez et al., 2009].
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
Input variables (based on physicochemical tests):
|
||
|
|
1 - fixed acidity
|
||
|
|
2 - volatile acidity
|
||
|
|
3 - citric acid
|
||
|
|
4 - residual sugar
|
||
|
|
5 - chlorides
|
||
|
|
6 - free sulfur dioxide
|
||
|
|
7 - total sulfur dioxide
|
||
|
|
8 - density
|
||
|
|
9 - pH
|
||
|
|
10 - sulphates
|
||
|
|
11 - alcohol
|
||
|
|
Output variable (based on sensory data):
|
||
|
|
12 - quality (score between 0 and 10)
|
||
|
|
|
||
|
|
8. Missing Attribute Values: None
|