CON-3132 docs(image-inspector) improve audit and subject

subjects/cybersecurity/image-inspector/README.md

@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ Images can contain more than just visual information, they often carry hidden da
 The goal is to develop a tool using a programming language of your choice (Python is recommended) that can analyze images to extract hidden information. Specifically, your tool should:
 
 1. **Extract Metadata**: Identify and display metadata from images, such as geolocation (latitude and longitude) where the photo was taken, the device used, and other relevant information.
-2. **Detect Steganography**: Discover and extract any hidden PGP keys or other data concealed within the image using steganography techniques.
+2. **Detect Steganography**: Discover and extract any hidden PGP keys within the image using steganography techniques.
 
 By completing this project, you will:
 

subjects/cybersecurity/image-inspector/audit/README.md

@@ -22,8 +22,6 @@ Suggested role play questions include:
 - How can this tool be used in real-life digital forensics or cybersecurity scenarios?
 - What ethical considerations should be taken into account when analyzing images for hidden data?
 
-###### Were the students able to answer all the questions?
-
 ###### Did the students demonstrate a thorough understanding of the concepts and technologies used in the project?
 
 ###### Were the students able to communicate effectively and justify their decisions and explain the knowledge behind this project?
@@ -64,7 +62,7 @@ $> image-inspector -m -o metadata.txt image-example1.jpeg
 $> image-inspector -s -o hidden_data.txt image-example1.jpeg
 ```
 
-###### Does the output correctly detect and extract any hidden PGP keys or other concealed information within the image?
+###### Does the output correctly detect and extract any hidden PGP keys within the image?
 
 ###### Is the output stored in the file specified in the output parameter?
 
@@ -79,18 +77,47 @@ The example image attached:
 
 ###### Test the tool with the provided example image and at least one other image to ensure the tool's robustness.
 
-###### Does the tool produce accurate and expected results for different images?
+```sh
+$> image-inspector -s -o hidden_data1.txt image-example1.jpeg
+Enter   -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
+Version: 01
+
+mQENBGIwpy4BC<...>
+=N8hc
+-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
+$>
+```
+
+```sh
+$> image-inspector -s -o hidden_data2.txt image-example2.jpeg
+-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
+xo0EZuV9/AEEANRklh3<...>
+=BhsK
+-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
+$>
+```
 
-##### Ensure that the student submission meets the project requirements:
+```sh
+$> image-inspector -s -o hidden_data3.txt image-example3.jpeg
+-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
+xo0EZuWBWQEEALrj<...>
+=SXXm
+-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
+$>
+```
 
-1. **Functionality:** Does the tool perform its intended functions accurately (metadata extraction and steganography detection)?
-2. **Data Accuracy:** Is the retrieved information accurate and relevant?
-3. **Ethical Considerations:** Are there clear guidelines and warnings about the ethical and legal use of the tool?
-4. **Usability:** Is the tool user-friendly and well-documented?
+```sh
+$> image-inspector -s -o hidden_data4.txt image-example4.jpeg
+-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
+xo0EZuWA9AE<...>
+=/1dE
+-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
+$>
+```
 
-###### Did the tool design and implementation align with all the project requirements above?
+> The results are cut. you can compare the beginning and the end of the results!
 
-###### Were the students able to implement a functional and reliable tool that meets the project requirements?
+###### Does the tool produce accurate and expected results for different images?
 
 #### Bonus